Sunday, October 18, 2015

Damned if You Do, Damned if You Don't: Tests for Innocence in Early European Court

It is definitely a relief that some of the early methods of court order in Medieval Europe no longer apply when it comes to law and order. Some of the descriptions Levack presented were somewhat frightening, in that there seemed to be no hope whatsoever for the accused, even if they were to be proven innocent. When I read the examples, the term, "Damned if you do, damned if you don't," comes to mind. You see, in order to prove one's innocence, the accused would have to perform some form of task that was more or less dangerous as a way of testing in God's name whether or not the accused (or victim) was innocent. Levack explained how people would have to do things like, "put his arm into hot water and in similar fashion reveal a healed limb after bandaging; or he would be thrown into a body of cold water and would be considered innocent only if he sank to the bottom..." (Levack 75-76). Tests such as these in order to prove someone's innocence are troubling because they are simply too dangerous and could very much cause the death, or at least severe injury of the accused. And the accused cannot even back out of the test, otherwise he will be proven guilty. So as you can see, this is why I would describe these methods of law and order as a "Damned if you do, damned if you don't," type of scenario. However, in regards to the changing trial laws during the witch-hunts, do you think the change in court law improved, or became worse?

Levack, Brian P. The Witch-Hunt in Early Modern Europe. London: Rutledge, 2013. Page.

2 comments:

  1. Thanks, Sarah. I'm anxious to see if Levack has revised this section in his new 4th edition due out this week. I'll have more to add to class on this section. Good last question!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would have to agree with your sentiments. Regarding the medieval methods' replacement, it seems kind of tricky. Although it provided a better basis through investigation, or inquisition, Levack argues that it was after the transition that more people were brought to trial for witchcraft. It definitely saw the increase in the role that legality played during the witch-hunts. I find it funny to see that the more regulation and investigation, the greater the uproar throughout Europe. Thanks for the post!

    ReplyDelete