source: Roper, Lyndal. Witch Craze. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.
Devoted to examining scholarly arguments about history related to the European witch-hunts, and primary documents from that period as well. A space to inform, write, analyze, critique, post images, and ask questions that emerge from our HIST 342 class at Drury University. Meshing out history from myth and popular ideas, we are devoted to understanding how a witch-hunt occurred historically and comparing patterns of behavior then and now.
Sunday, November 22, 2015
Roper's enlightened witch-trials
Tomorrow's reading in Roper is about the influence of the Enlightenment and how it changed the ideas and proceedings of witch interrogations and trials.The trial of Catharina Schmid is a focus of Roper and used to display her argument from the beginning to the middle of the chapter. As Roper explains, Catherina's trial which took place in southern Germany, used torture that violated rules, was targeted towards an elderly woman (74 years old), and displayed a separation between the lower class (Schmid) and the upper (Roper, 227 and 231). However there is a new significance to this case. As Roper explains, this case took place in 1745 which was over 100 years after the attributed end to the witch crazes that caused mass panic and executions and with the Enlightenment came an increase in record keeping (Roper, 228). Her major point through all of this is the detail of the emotion that scribes recorded through the entire process. Although the trials followed a similar format, instead of focusing on the confessions the scribes during the Enlightenment focused on the testimonies of others throughout the case. Why would there be such a drastic change in focus for proof? Roper briefly explains that due to the long break between 1650 and the reemergence of witch-trials in the 18th century the court systems had to redesign their tactics because they didn't have access to many of the original doctrine (Roper, 231). As a student of history I would like to believe that people learn from previous history. Thereofore, and I think this is what Roper is trying to argue as well, because of the lack of records concerning the search for proof there was an increase in displaying this process and what people said through the trial for future generations to come. Within her chapter she also discusses the Enlightenment and some other characteristics that influenced the witch-trials, briefly what are these new ideas? Also, if at the end of these witch hunts, just like those earlier in the 16th and 17th centuries, there were still executions of people were these changes truly significant?
source: Roper, Lyndal. Witch Craze. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.
source: Roper, Lyndal. Witch Craze. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)